Halting Jackdaw gasoline discipline

Sharing is caring!

Greenpeace insisted that by giving the event the inexperienced mild the Authorities had “proven no regard” for emissions or the undertaking’s “final local weather influence”.

The approval offers the go-ahead for drilling of 4 manufacturing wells, and the set up of a 31 km pipeline from the Jackdaw WHP to the Shearwater platform within the Central North Sea. 


Ami McCarthy of Greenpeace UK added: “We expect that’s illegal, we’re taking a look at authorized motion to cease Jackdaw, and battle this each step of the way in which.”

Her feedback got here after UK Enterprise and Power Secretary Kwasi Kwarteng confirmed Shell had been given the go-ahead for the sector, which is located in waters to the east of Aberdeen.

The vitality big Shell says that its peak, Jackdaw “is anticipated to ship 6.5% of UKCS (UK Continental Shelf) gasoline manufacturing for lower than 1% of UKCS emissions and produce an quantity of vitality equal to heating over 1.4 million UK houses”.


Mr. Kwarteng confirmed on Wednesday afternoon that the “Jackdaw gasoline discipline – initially licensed in 1970 – has as we speak obtained last regulatory approval”.

He tweeted: “We’re turbocharging renewables and nuclear, however we’re additionally lifelike about our vitality wants now.

“Let’s supply extra of the gasoline we want from British waters to guard vitality safety.”

However the choice sparked anger from environmental campaigners, with Ms. McCarthy claiming that giving it the go-ahead was a “determined and harmful choice from Johnson’s Authorities”.

Activists organised a protest exterior Queen Elizabeth Home, the UK Authorities hub in Edinburgh yesterday afternoon. And over 3,600 individuals signed a petition by Associates of the Earth Scotland, Greenpeace, and Uplift opposing the sector.


She added: “As soon as once more, they’re handing out profitable permits to the likes of Shell for a undertaking that received’t begin producing gasoline for years, that received’t decrease our payments, however will create large emissions inflicting lethal flooding and wildfires, and mass migration from individuals fleeing the local weather disaster.”

Kate Norgrove, the chief director of advocacy and campaigns at WWF, branded the choice a “staggering backward step for the local weather”.

She argued: “Essentially the most cost-effective resolution to the vitality disaster is to finish our habit to dangerous fossil fuels as soon as and for all, via the fast scaling up of renewables and a turbocharged effort to make our houses vitality environment friendly

“The UK Authorities should quickly rethink their course of journey, which represents a transparent breach of their legally binding net-zero commitments.”


Tessa Khan of the marketing campaign group Uplift claimed in the meantime that approving Jackdaw was “extraordinarily disappointing and misconceived”.

She instructed BBC Radio Scotland’s Good Morning Scotland program: “It’s a disastrous and wrong-headed choice from the Authorities when individuals want actual options.”

Ms. Khan added: “After all, we all know that we are able to’t even have any new oil or gasoline infrastructure or fields if we’re going to keep inside a habitable local weather.”

This creator 

Katrine Bussey is a PA Scotland Political Editor

You may also like


Automotive free

All through July near 1,000 individuals throughout the UK gave up their automotive, ...

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published.

7 − one =

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More in Agenda