Shell no (we ain’t alright)

Sharing is caring!

Exploiting the Cambo oil subject won’t deal with excessive vitality payments, campaigners warned amid stories Shell is reconsidering its choice to tug out of the challenge.

Work on the proposed improvement off the west coast of Shetland was paused in December after the vitality agency determined to withdraw from the scheme, concluding the financial case for funding was “not robust sufficient”.

Nonetheless, the worth of oil has since risen to greater than £76 a barrel, with fears over the way forward for Russian oil sending costs hovering, and there have been calls to spice up vitality safety by growing North Sea oil and gasoline drilling.


Sources have instructed the BBC that though Shell’s official place stays the identical, it did acknowledge the “financial, political and regulatory atmosphere had modified enormously” within the three months since Shell introduced it was pulling out of the challenge.

Business physique Offshore Energies UK – previously Oil and Fuel UK – has beforehand stated blocking long-planned vitality tasks similar to Cambo would danger leaving the UK on the mercy of world vitality shortages.

However Greenpeace warned the proposed improvement wouldn’t deal with excessive payments or enhance vitality safety and urged the UK Authorities to throw its weight behind renewables, insulation and warmth pumps to get the UK off oil and gasoline.

Shell’s choice to tug out was introduced simply weeks after the UK hosted the UN Cop26 local weather summit in Glasgow, the place international locations pledged to attempt to restrict world warming to 1.5C to keep away from the worst impacts of an overheating planet.

The Worldwide Power Company has stated that no new oil and gasoline exploration tasks ought to go forward if the world is to fulfill the 1.5C purpose.


In November, Scotland’s First Minister Nicola Sturgeon stated the Cambo challenge mustn’t go forward, following months of strain from opposition events and campaigners for the Scottish Authorities to make its place on Cambo clear.

And the advisory Local weather Change Committee has stated excessive costs are pushed by world markets and growing UK fossil gasoline extraction would have just about no impression on payments, urging efforts to chop oil and gasoline demand as an alternative.

Philip Evans, oil and gasoline transition campaigner for Greenpeace UK, stated the Cambo challenge would produce heavy crude oil, for which the UK has little or no refining capability, and it might “do nothing to deal with excessive payments or shore up vitality safety”.

He stated: “Shell wasn’t keen on pursuing this challenge when it was a nasty search for them, however now they stand to realize billions within the midst of wartime value hikes, they’re once more.


“In the meantime our payments soar, and offshore employees are trapped in a risky business. The UK and North Sea communities deserve higher.

“With the spring assertion and a brand new vitality technique developing, the Authorities should throw its weight behind British renewables, a correct house insulation scheme and warmth pump rollout, or our vitality coverage will likely be disrupted by the whims of fossil gasoline giants for many years.”

Tessa Khan, of the environmental marketing campaign group Uplift, instructed Good Morning Scotland: “It’s apparent that Shell has seen a possibility within the elevated oil value to maybe make a revenue.

“However the causes to not assist Cambo – the truth that it’s not going to decrease vitality payments within the UK, it’s not going to assist us meet home vitality demand as a result of its oil will likely be exported to worldwide markets and naturally the huge local weather impression it’s going to have.


“None of these issues have modified. So the case in opposition to opening up Cambo stays stronger than ever.”

Pals of the Earth vitality campaigner Danny Gross stated: “Growing the Cambo oil subject would do nothing to scale back hovering gasoline payments.

“As 80 % of the oil extracted within the UK is exported, it wouldn’t meaningfully enhance our vitality safety both.”

“The vitality disaster highlights the necessity to scale back our reliance on more and more costly gasoline and oil which can be additionally wrecking our local weather,” he stated, calling for reasonable, homegrown renewables and a nationwide insulation programme.

This Writer

Emily Beament is the PA atmosphere correspondent.

You may also like


Automotive free

All through July near 1,000 individuals throughout the UK gave up their automotive, ...

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published.

1 × three =

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More in Agenda